Dating in Your 20sTake the quiz

Situationships

How do you ask 'what are we' without scaring them off?

Lead with what you want, ask in person at a calm moment, and leave room for an honest answer. A clear, low-pressure question rarely scares off someone who was going to stay.

Jump to a section
  1. Why does this question feel so terrifying?
  2. When is the right time to ask?
  3. How do you ask without it sounding like an ultimatum?
  4. Should you ask over text?
  5. What if they dodge, or the answer isn’t what you wanted?
  6. What to do this week
  7. What doesn’t the research show?

Say what you want first, then ask what they want, in person, at a calm moment, and make it clear any honest answer is okay. A clear, low-pressure question almost never scares off someone who was planning to stick around. It just shows you sooner who wasn’t.

The goal is not to trap them into a label. It’s to stop guessing.

Why does this question feel so terrifying?

Because it’s the topic people dodge most. Back in 1985, communication researchers Leslie Baxter and William Wilmot asked people what subjects they avoided with someone close to them, and the state of the relationship itself topped the list for romantic partners. So if you’ve drafted “what are we” in your Notes app eleven times and deleted it, you’re in very normal company.

There’s also a good chance you’re misreading how the other person sees you. In 2018 research published in Psychological Science, Erica Boothby and colleagues found that after a conversation, people consistently underestimate how much the other person liked them and enjoyed talking to them. Researchers call it the liking gap. It showed up between strangers in the lab and between new college dorm mates, where it lasted for months.

Those studies weren’t about dating. But if you tend to assume you’re more into them than they are into you, that assumption might be part of what’s making the question feel risky.

When is the right time to ask?

There’s no magic number of dates. A better test: ask once you know what you want, and before you’ve spent so long not asking that it feels weird to start.

Earlier is usually kinder to both of you. In a 2019 Pew Research Center survey, single adults looking to date who said it had been hard named one reason more than any other: 53% said finding someone looking for the same type of relationship was a major reason. That mismatch is exactly what this conversation is for. Finding out at week three stings. Finding out at month eight hurts a lot more.

How do you ask without it sounding like an ultimatum?

A few moves make a big difference:

  • Start with your side. “I like where this is going and I’d like us to be exclusive” is easier to answer than “so what are we?” It gives them something real to respond to.
  • Ask, don’t announce. End with an actual question, and mean it. “How are you feeling about it?” works.
  • Build in an out. “It’s okay if you’re not there yet” lowers the stakes for both of you, and it makes an honest answer more likely than a polite one.
  • Pick a low-pressure moment. Walking somewhere, cooking, the drive home. Not mid-argument, not after a few too many drinks, and not right after they cancelled on you.

And yes, you’ll probably feel exposed. In a set of seven studies published in 2018, Anna Bruk and colleagues at the University of Mannheim found that people judge their own moments of vulnerability, like confessing romantic feelings, much more harshly than they judge the same moment in someone else. Researchers named it the “beautiful mess” effect. You see a mess. The other person is more likely to see someone being brave.

Take Maya. Two months of Friday nights with Jordan, no label. She’d been waiting for “the perfect moment” for weeks. She finally asked while they were walking back from tacos: “I really like this, and I’m not seeing anyone else. Are you?” Jordan laughed and said he’d been wondering the same thing. Not every version ends that neatly. But the walk home was a lot less dramatic than the six weeks of rehearsing.

Should you ask over text?

If you can avoid it, yes, avoid it. Tone gets lost. In a 2005 study, Justin Kruger, Nicholas Epley and colleagues found that people sending emails were overconfident that their tone (serious, sarcastic, joking) would come across, and misreadings were common even between people who knew each other. A “what are we” text can read as casual, needy or cold depending on how the other person’s day is going.

If texting is the only realistic option, use the text to set up the conversation, not to have it. “Can we talk about us this week?” is a fine text. A full paragraph about your feelings, sent at 1 a.m., is not.

What if they dodge, or the answer isn’t what you wanted?

Communication researchers still haven’t fully mapped this conversation. A University of Texas at Austin dissertation by Sarah Varga called the “define the relationship” talk commonly understood but understudied, and built its picture from forty in-depth interviews about what happens before, during and after it. So no one has a proven formula. What you can control is asking clearly.

If they say “I don’t know yet,” that’s a real answer. Ask what would help them know, and decide how long you’re happy to wait. If they say no, you just got weeks or months of your life back. If they change the subject after a clear question, you can say so gently: “I noticed we skipped past that. I’d still like to know.” A second dodge is information too.

What to do this week

  • Finish this sentence privately: “What I want from this is…” If you can’t, start there.
  • Choose your script above and tweak it until it sounds like you.
  • Plan the moment. Something low-key you’re already doing together.
  • Ask once, clearly. Then actually listen. Let a pause be a pause.
  • Decide your next step in advance. If the answer is “not sure,” know how long “not sure” works for you.

What doesn’t the research show?

  • The taboo-topics finding dates from 1985. It shows the topic is commonly avoided, not that asking goes badly.
  • The liking gap studies were about friendly conversations, not dating. They suggest a general bias, not how any specific person feels about you.
  • The vulnerability studies mostly used imagined scenarios, so real reactions may vary.
  • The email study was about email between people in experiments, not texting a crush. It’s a reason to be careful with tone, not a rule.
  • No study can predict this person’s answer. The research makes the case for asking clearly, not for any particular outcome.

Try it

Where are you with this person right now?

A few weeks in and honestly not sure what this is

Early and fuzzy

This is the easiest point to ask, because nobody has built a whole routine around not asking yet. You do not need a label, just a sense of whether you both want to keep going.

Your next step: Ask the casual version next time you are hanging out, not before.

It's been months and still no word for it

Undefined on autopilot

The longer something runs without a name, the more the not-asking becomes part of the deal. That is momentum, not an answer from them.

Your next step: Pick a calm evening this week and use the direct version.

Every time I hint at it, they change the subject

The repeat dodge

Hints are easy to sidestep, so a dodge might just mean the question never actually landed. After one clear ask, though, another swerve is a pattern worth taking seriously.

Your next step: Ask once, in plain words, and let the silence sit for a second.

I already know I'm scared of the answer

Fear doing the talking

That fear usually means you care about the outcome, which is exactly why you deserve to know it. People also tend to judge their own vulnerability much more harshly than others do.

Your next step: Write down what you want first, so their answer cannot rewrite it.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the ones you can't stop thinking about.See your pattern

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • If you want to keep it casual

    Okay, random question. I really like hanging out with you and I'm curious where your head's at with us. No wrong answer, I just want to know we're on the same page.

  • If you want to be direct

    I've been thinking about this and I want to be honest: I'd like us to be dating for real, just us. How are you feeling about it? It's okay if you're not there.

  • Over text, if you must

    Can I ask you something kind of real? I've liked these past few weeks a lot and I'd love to talk about what we're doing. Want to grab a drink this week and actually talk about it?

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Justin J. Lehmiller

Research on sex, desire, casual relationships and friends with benefits.

Social psychologist (PhD, Purdue); Senior Research Fellow, The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Nedra Glover Tawwab

Boundaries in relationships, family and friendship, and how to say what you need.

Licensed therapist; founder of Kaleidoscope Counseling · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Ramani Durvasula

Narcissistic and high conflict relationships, and recovering after leaving one.

Licensed clinical psychologist; Professor Emerita of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 8 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Taboo TopicsEncyclopedia of Human Relationships (SAGE), 2009Used for: Summarizes Baxter and Wilmot's 1985 study of taboo topics in close relationships, in which the state of the relationship itself was the topic most often avoided between romantic partners.
  2. Beautiful mess effect: Self-other differences in evaluation of showing vulnerabilityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (University of Mannheim), 2018Used for: Across seven studies, people rated their own displays of vulnerability (such as confessing romantic feelings or admitting a mistake) more negatively than they rated the same displays by others, who saw them as more positive and desirable.
  3. You Probably Made a Better First Impression Than You ThinkAssociation for Psychological Science (reporting Boothby, Cooney, Sandstrom and Clark, Psychological Science, 2018), 2018Used for: After conversations, people systematically underestimated how much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company (the liking gap), in lab conversations between strangers, among first-year college dorm mates, and in a workshop; among dorm mates it lasted for several months.
  4. Personal experiences and attitudes of datersPew Research Center, 2020-08Used for: Among single-and-looking adults who said finding people to date had been difficult, 53% said finding someone looking for the same type of relationship was a major reason, the top reason listed (survey of 4,860 U.S. adults, October 2019).
  5. E-mail Etiquette: More Critical than You Might ThinkNYU Stern School of Business (reporting Kruger, Epley, Parker and Ng, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005), 2005Used for: Senders of e-mail were typically overconfident that recipients would correctly read their intended tone (sarcasm, seriousness, anger, sadness or humor); misunderstandings were common even when sender and recipient knew each other, and senders were largely unaware of it.
  6. Defining the DTR: what it is, what it isn't, and how it functions in romantic relationship developmentUniversity of Texas at Austin (doctoral dissertation, Sarah Varga)Used for: The 'define the relationship' conversation is commonly understood but has yet to be fully explained by communication scholars; the study used forty semi-structured interviews about what happens before, during and after the DTR.
Up nextAre they losing interest, or am I overthinking it?